Back to Master's Index Page

ED 5990 Unit Exercises and Discussions
Richard Bloodworth


Unit Three

U3D1

Post an overview of your literature review. This is a brief discussion of your finding so far or an outline of what will be included in your final literature review. Comment on the postings of at least 3 other learners that offers help or asks clarifying questions.

All of the books, articles, and information sources listed in the bibliography refer to discussions of the concept of democracy and the use of technology to facilitate democratic procedures. The literature review will involve concepts from and reviews of the information sources listed in the bibliography � all will be referred to but some of the books that will be reviewed include:

Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum & Recall

Citizens As Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States

Direct Democracy in Switzerland

Democracy in the Digital Age : Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace

Democracy at Risk

Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy

The New Challenge of Direct Democracy

A Constitution of Direct Democracy: Pure Democracy and the Governance of the Future ~ Locally and Globally

Direct Democracy or Representative Government? Dispelling the Populist Myth

Electronic Democracy

The Evolution of American Democracy.

E-topia

Adult Education for Social Change: From Center Stage to the Wings and Back Again

Electronic Voting: Benefits and Risks

Democracy, Real and Ideal

The Social Contract --- Richard



 
Bibliography:

 Aronowitz, S., Martinsons, B., Menser, M., and Rich, J. (1996). Technoscience and Cyberculture . New York and London: Routledge.

Becker, T. & Slaton, C.D. (2000). The Future of Teledemocracy . Praeger Publishers.

Benhabib, S., and Dallmayr, F. (1990). The Communicative Ethics Controversy . London: The MIT Press.

Blaug, Ricardo (1999). Democracy: Real and Ideal, Discourse Ethics and Radical Politics . Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

Bowler, S., Donovan, T. & Tolbert, C. (1998). Citizens As Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States . Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

Bowler, S, & Donovan, T. (2001). Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy . Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Brock, William. (1970). The Evolution of American Democracy. New York: The Dial Press.

Browning, G. & Powell, A.C. (2002). Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Transform American Politics . Cyberage Books.

Budge, Ian. (1997). The New Challenge of Direct Democracy . Polity Press.

Burns, J., Peltason, J., & Cronin, T. (1990). Government by the People: Bill of Rights Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bushell, Sue. (2003). Where to Now for E-Voting? Retrieved January. 24, 2004 from: http://www.cio.com.au/index.php?id=405941257&eid=-601

Caldwell, John Thornton. (2000). Electronic Media and Technoculture . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Castells. Information Technology, Globalization, and Social Development.

Chomsky, N. (1994). Democracy and Education. http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/talks/9410-education.html

Corrado, A. & Firestone, C.M. (1997). Elections in Cyberspace: Toward a New Era in American Politics.

Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute Publications Office.

Cronin, Thomas E. (1999). Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum & Recall . Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

Becker, T. & Slaton, C.D. (2000). The Future of Teledemocracy . New York: Praeger Publishers.

Dafermos, G. (2001). Management and Virtual Decentralized Networks: The Linus Project. http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue6_11/dafermos/#d2

Dewey, John. (1997). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education . New York: Free Press, Simon & Schuster.

Dillman, Don. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Designed Method . New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fossedal, Gregory A. (2002). Direct Democracy in Switzerland. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.

Gerber, E. R., Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.D. & Kiewiet, D.R. (2000). Stealing the Initiative: How State

Gates, Jeff. (2000). Democracy at Risk. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing.
Government Responds to Direct Democracy . Prentice Hall.

Haskell, John. (2000). Direct Democracy or Representative Government?: Dispelling the Populist Myth .

Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Heaney, Thomas. Adult Education for Social Change: From Center Stage to the Wings and Back Again .

(1996). Retrieved on January 15, 2004 from http://www.nl.edu/ace/Resources/Documents/ERIC1.html

Isin, Engin F. (2000). Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City . New York and London: Routledge.

Lebihan, Rachel. (2003). Arm Twisting to Hinder Home Electronic Voting . Retrieved on October 24, 2003 from http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/communications/story/0,2000048620,20265293,00.htm

MacNamara, O'Donnell. Developing e-Citizens and e-Consumers, an Irish e-Commerce Case Study .http://66.218.71.225/search/cache?p=The+Ecitizen.+Instructional+Technology.,+Lee,+John+K.++&sub=Search&ei=UTF-8&url=fe_aPyZrSDAJ:www.efmd.be/learninggroups/chapter/eisb2001proceedings/pdfs/MacNamara%2520%2520O%27Donnell%2520.pdf

Mautner, Michael Noah. (2000). A Constitution of Direct Democracy : Pure Democracy and the Governance of the Future ~ Locally and Globally . Legacy Books.

McRae, Hamish. (1994). The World in 2020: Power, Culture, and Prosperity . Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Mitchell, William J. (2000). E-topia . London: The MIT Press.

Naisbitt, John. (1997). Megatrends Asia . New York: Touchstone.

North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. How to Identify and Explore Emerging Issues, Vignettes:

Patrick. (2003). Recent Email from a Swiss Citizen . Retrieved on January 17, 2004 from http://www.vote.org/swiss.htm

Plato. (1998). Republic . New York: Oxford University Press.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. (1999). The Social Contract . New York: Oxford University Press.

Salant, P. & Dillman, D. (1994). How to Conduct Your Own Survey . New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Shamos, M.I. (1993). Electronic Voting � Evaluating the Threat . http://www.cpsr.org/conferences/cfp93/shamos.html

Smith, Russell. Electronic Voting: Benefits and Risks . (2002). http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/ti224.pdf

Toffler, Alvin. (1980). The Third Wave . New York: Bantam Books.

Vago, Steven. (1999). Strategies of Change . Chapter 9: Social Change. Pearson Educational, Inc.

Wilhelm, Anthony G. (2000). Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace . New York and London: Routledge.


Websites pertaining to democracy:

http://www.developmentgateway.org/node/130619/?page_id=3647 (worldwide egovernment)
http://thomas.loc.gov/ ( the proceedings of the U.S. Congress and egovernment development)
http://egov.mit.gov.in/ (egovernment in India)
http://www.abc.net.au/ola/citizen/interdemoc/republic.htm
http://www.veritasdigital.com/ad_online/participatory.html
http://www.cpsu.org.uk/downloads/Modernising%20Background.pdf
http://www.publicus.net/ebook/
http://www.mail-archive.com/do-wire@tc.umn.edu/msg00045.html
http://policy.womenspace.ca/activities/brainstorm/policy/
http://www.analysphere.com/21Oct00/democracy.htm
http://www.statskontoret.se/gol-democracy/links/Popular/
http://www.itac.ca/client/ITAC/ITAC_UW_MainEngine.nsf/object/Imperative/$file/Agnew.pdf
http://www.one2one.co.nz/edemocracy.html
http://www.politics.tcd.ie/courses/undergrad/bcc/portal/egovernance.html
http://www.internetnz.net.nz/members/lists/isocnz-council-tidbits/2000-August/000012.html
http://www.flaxroots.net.nz/2000/papers/2000-PaulHughes.html
http://www.context.co.nz:8080/newsItems/viewDepartment$Participatory+Democracy
http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/00/dec/scott.html
http://www.diverdiver.com/2003_03_07_diverdiver_archive.html
http://www.democracy-online.org/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A8287-2003Feb26
http://lists.essential.org/1995/info-policy-notes/msg00137.html
http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/03bensaid (third way government)
http://www.jhu.edu/news_info/news/topic/politics.html (online voting)
http://lone-eagles.com/democracy.htm (list of related links and sources)
http://www.democracy-online.org/ (another list of related links and sources)
http://egov.mit.gov.in/ (egovernment development in India)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/greeks/greekdemocracy_01.shtml
http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Philosophy/UG/ugunits0102/rousseau.html
http://www.wabash.edu/Rousseau/WorksonWeb.html
http://www.sosig.ac.uk/roads/subject-listing/World-cat/philpol.html
http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Poli/PoliFeld.htm
http://www.bu.edu/wcp/MainPoli.htm
http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Poli/PoliBuch.htm
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/locke/locke2/2nd-contents.html
http://www.sosig.ac.uk/roads/subject-listing/World-cat/demgovt.html
http://www.ancientworlds.net/aw/Post/32871
http://www.radford.edu/~wkovarik/class/300/300pix/300.ideas.html
http://teachers.ausd.net/antilla/philolinks.html
http://plato.stanford.edu
http://www.rep.routledge.com/index.html
http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Philosophy/Dept/journals.html
http://www.bris.ac.uk/DeptsPhilosophy/Dept/Links.htm
http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Philosophy/VL/index.html
http://web.mit.edu/polisci/www/research/goodness.html
http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff0600.htm
http://www.anova.org/
http://www.developmentgateway.org/node/130619/?page_id=3647
http://www.pdemokracie.ecn.cz/cs/doc/Statut-ang.doc
http://edemocracy.meetup.com/members/878
http://dmoz.org/Society/Politics/Democracy/Direct_Democracy/
http://www.dominion-web.com/directory/Top/Society/Politics/Democracy/Direct_Democracy
http://www.free-project.org/connect/links/
http://www.election.com/http://www.votehere.net/
http://www.lib.ied.edu.hk/edarticle/civic.htm
http://edu.uwe.ac.uk/cred/bibliographic/papers.asp
http://www.egov.vic.gov.au/Research/ElectronicDemocracy/voting.htm
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/voting2.html

from Karen:

Hi Richard, Really impressive list of resources in your assignment posting. There is quite a bit of information. Do you have a plan for providing contrasting (or contrarian) viewpoints in your final version of your Literature Review?

There are two books that I've read which I highly recommend, especially Nye's book which was an eye opener when I read it two years ago:

1. "The Paradox of American Power: Why the world's only superpower can't go it alone" Written by Joseph S. Nye, Jr. who is Dean of the Kennedy School of government at Harvard University. Published by Oxford University Press in 2002.

2. "The future of freedom; Illiberal democracy at home and abroad" Written by Fareed Zakaria who is editor of Newsweek International. (he also has a PhD from Harvard.....which I found to be interesting, since he's younger than many "more seasoned" writers whose books I often read.)

I received the most recent New York Review of Books this week (November 4, 2004). It is a special "election" issue, and I read a number of terrific articles and book reviews that related so closely (resources on both sides of a viewpoint too) to your project. One in particular called, "The Election and America's Future" gave me pause to reflect, especially the graphics' map of the world with countries either in red or blue (for Bush or Kerry). I highly recommend it.

I have to tell you that I saw so many resources for your project in this issue - that if you'd like me to overnight my copy to you can't find a copy, please email me your address and telephone number and I'll FedEx it so that you receive it early next week. I'd be delighted to get it to you. I'm not sure if they are like the New York Times (newspaper) - where you can access recent articles for free if you register your email address.

Again, nice work! I'm keenly interested in your project, and look forward to reading more of your work. If I can ever help you with your project, please let me know. Have a great rest of your week. --- Karen

My reply to Karen:

Karen, Thank you for your generous offer! The New York Review of Books is a great magazine � I once subscribed to it � even though it is about books and is not the books themselves, the commentary is very high level. I'll check the newsstand and bookstore tomorrow to see if they have that issue and if they don't, I might take you up on your offer. I will look up those other books as well. Thank you! --- Richard

Comment from Howard:

Richard, this is an impressive array or sources. It is interesting how even the basic act of voting does not take advantage of the existing technology. People are afraid of fraud with computer voting and many of these people pay their bills over the Internet.

My reply:

I think people are afraid of anything that is new. They are just going to have to get over that fear!

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself (Franklin D. Roosevelt, I think). --- Richard

P.S. to Karen's feedback to Richard Bloodworth

Fareed Zakaria of the second book I mentioned is a featured guest on Comedy Central's "Daily Show" at 7:00 p.m. tonight.....small synchronicity, yes? I was talking with a friend on the telephone this afternoon after I posted feedback to you, and learned that one of the authors that I mentioneed to you was interviewed over the weekend and the show is being re-run tonight. Hope it helps. Kindest Regards, --- Karen

My reply to Karen:

Karen, I hope I can watch that as a rerun since I was not able to watch it tonight. --- Richard

From Geri:

Karen: Thanks for the info on Jon Stewart's show tonight. I don't watch much TV, but I like Jon's 'fake news' show. When I am in New York I like to sit in at TV show filmings. It's much more fun than watching TV. I was at The Daily Show last March. Next Monday I will be in the audience for Colin Quinn's 'Tough Crowd' show. The show is a bit less eloquent, but as a Native New Yorker I like the relaxed atmosphere on the set and the New York style of sarastic humor. When I lived in Manhattan I spent many weekend nights at the 'Comic Strip' comedy club. Anyway, I'll be watching Jon Stewart tonight. Thanks! :^) --- Geri

From Geri:

Richard: You have assembled an excellent list of resources for your project. Our voting procedures truly need revisions and improvements that should protect our rights as voters to have our votes counted.

My questions do not necessarily pertain to your Literature Review, but to your project:

- Will you be addressing the issue of having a percentage of the electoral votes going to each candidate determined by total votes instead of having all go to one candidate?

My reply to Geri:

I have always wondered that: why the total number of electoral votes of a state goes to a candidate rather than a percentage based on the number of votes received by the candidates. I have read the Constitution several times looking for that point and I have not seen where it says that all of the electoral votes goes to one candidate. By the way, my idea of Internet voting is a separate issue from the Electoral College so my idea could conceivably exist with it but the archaic Electoral College at some point in the future will be replaced.

- For many years Americans have asked why we are limited to a twelve hour period to cast votes when other countries allow several days or more for voters to cast their votes. Will your project address this issue?

Reply:

In Athens, GA we can vote during the week before the election day so I plan on voting next week. I will address that issue in my project also.

- Florida has already opened their polls. I received a phone call this week telling me that I could cast my votes any day this week. Personally, I order absentee ballots. This way, I am not surprised when I enter the voting booth by seeing voting issues that were not mentioned in the newspapers. I have the option of mailing in my ballot (which I have already) or of using my absentee ballot to take the time to look at all issues. Then I have the option to go to the poll, have my absentee ballot destroyed and then cast my vote at the poll. If I can vote ahead of time why can't we all have a longer time period for traditional voting? Just my thoughts ... Geri

My reply:

When over seas, I have gotten absentee ballots and have also used them while I have been in the USA for the same reason that you mentioned � so that the issues can be studied and considered prior to the voting procedures. One reason for having the ballots online is that they issues can be studied prior to going into the voting booth. Thank you for your comments. --- Richard

From Geri:

- Will you be addressing the issue of having a percentage of the electoral votes going to each candidate determined by total votes instead of having all go to one candidate?

My reply to Geri:

I have always wondered aobut that: why the total number of electoral votes of a state goes to a candidate rather than a percentage based on the number of votes received by the candidates. I have read the Constitution several times looking for that point and I have not seen where it says that all of the electoral votes goes to one candidate. By the way, my idea of Internet voting is a separate issue from the Electoral College so my idea could conceivably coexist with it but the archaic Electoral College at some point in the future will be replaced. --- Richard

Comment:

- For many years Americans have asked why we are limited to a twelve hour period to cast votes when other countries allow several days or more for voters to cast their votes. Will your project address this issue?

My reply:

In Athens, GA we can vote during the week before the election day so I plan on voting next week. I will address that issue in my project also. Thank you for your comments, --- Richard

Comment from Brad:

Richard, Is your focus of Switzerland to show how succesful Direct Democracy can be for a nation? Are there other examples? Will you be exploring the opponents' views of Direct Democracy? You seem to have a great resource list. You appear to be very passionate about this topic, and I hope it proves to be a great project. --- Brad Richardson

My c omment to Brad:

Yes, I plan to show how it is working in Switzerland and other places and that it can be utilized it the USA also. The books and sources include both sides of the issues -- the federalist and the populist -- of the issue with some of the sources in favor of representative and some in favor of direct democracy. My idea combines both concepts as a sort of compromise between the two positions. The federalist position believes that ordinary people are not capable of governing themselves whereas the populists are suspicious of the authorities and would like to be able to have a government based on the will of the people. The main problem, of course, is: how is the will of the people to be determined? In a representative system someone is elected to represent and think like the majority of the people who elected him which is, in actuality, an impossible task. Someone might think of having a representative as like an actor having an agent -- no one would expect the actor to be looking in the want ads for all of his acting roles so someone needs to take care of some of his needs so that he can concentrate on his art. Perhaps a more descriptive analogy is that a the relationship between the government and the governed is comparable to the relationship of a parent and a child � at what point is the child considered capable of making his own decisions rather than having them made by a parent or authority? --- Richard

Comment from Katherine:

You have an impressive list. I particularly liked that you included some texts which addressed the question of managing change. For your project to succeed, I think understanding the sociology of how change occurs at a cultural level will be essential.

My reply:

Katherine, I think you are right concerning the management of change. Technology is the easy part of the concept. The difficult part involves changing habitual thought patterns, psychology, sociology, cultural beliefs and philosophy. --- Richard

Comment to Tanneka about her list of sources for colaborative learning,

This is a great list of sources. I plan on referring to some of the sources while developing the curriculum to go with my course project. Thank you, --- Richard


Unit 3: Gather Resources and Present a Brief Annotated Bibliography

This page lists the unit's Objectives and Learning Activities.
Objectives

By the end of this unit, a successful learner should be able to:

  1. Demonstrate ability to seek out relevant literature on a topic.
  2. Organize the literature into a paper that supports the development of the final project.
Study
Presentation

Read this Learning Unit's Presentation .
Assignments and Discussions
u03a1 Literature Review

Read 15 - 20 resources related to your topic.
  1. Make notes on findings, theories, opinions, attitudes, and examples of your topic.
  2. Develop an overview or outline of your ten-page, typed, double-spaced literature review paper.
  3. Submit this paper to your instructor for review and comment.
u03d1 Topics

Remember, peer and subject-matter-expert discussion about your topic, and the way that you want to pursue your project, can provide invaluable assistance in refining your focus. Feel free to discuss your ideas and offer candid (and constructive) advice on the projects others are considering. Give a brief description of the findings, theories, opinions, attitudes, and examples of your topic. Then, comment on the outlines presented by at least five other classmates.